Bloody and Logitech: two approaches to mouse macros
Bloody (A4Tech) is a Taiwanese manufacturer whose mice were designed from the ground up for gamers who want to record macros. The Bloody Core interface is simple, supports up to 3 profiles, and recorded macros live directly in the mouse's onboard memory — no software needs to be running during play. That's the key advantage.
Logitech (G series) is the industry standard among professionals. G HUB supports Lua scripting, giving you flexibility on the level of full-blown programming. Pro players overwhelmingly use G Pro and G502 mice. The downside: G HUB occasionally conflicts with other software and needs updates.
Macro accuracy: which is more precise?
Macro execution accuracy depends on the mouse's polling rate and sensor quality. Both the Bloody W90 Max and Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2 run at 2000 Hz polling rate (versus the standard 1000 Hz on most mice). In practice, you can't notice a difference in recoil pattern accuracy — both tools operate with under 0.1ms of error.
What matters more than the mouse is the quality of the recorded pattern. That's exactly why MACROSCS macros are tested on real hardware for each mouse model — Bloody A60, A90, Logitech G502, G Pro, G403. Patterns are tuned for the specific polling rate and sensitivity.
Ban risk: Bloody vs Logitech
Neither Bloody Core nor Logitech G HUB violates CS2's VAC or FACEIT rules — both are official peripheral-manufacturer software. Macros in them run at the driver level, not as external programs injecting into the game.
The one real risk: a macro pattern that's inhumanly precise (zero variance, a perfect spray every single time). MACROSCS macros deliberately add slight randomization to the pattern, mimicking a human hand. That's what keeps them invisible to FACEIT's behavioral analysis.
Which mouse to pick for CS2 macros
If you already own a Logitech G-series mouse, use it. G HUB + Lua scripts from MACROSCS give you maximum flexibility: adjust pattern sensitivity, add profile switching on a button, configure different patterns for different weapons.
If you're planning to buy a new mouse, the Bloody A4 Light Strike or Bloody W60 Pro are excellent value. MACROSCS Bloody Core scripts are compatible with the entire lineup. Don't overpay — what matters for macros is a 1000Hz+ polling rate, not the mouse's price tag.
Razer: the third player in the market
Razer Synapse supports macros through its "Macro Studio." The DeathAdder V3 and Viper V3 Pro are popular among professionals. MACROSCS supports Razer — scripts are compatible with Synapse 3 and 4. Razer's main downside: Synapse is sometimes heavier on CPU and starts up slower than G HUB or Bloody Core.
Final ranking for CS2 macros in 2026: Logitech G (Lua flexibility) → Razer (best sensor) → Bloody (simplicity, onboard storage). All three work with MACROSCS macros with zero extra configuration.